Sunday, July 14, 2013

Sunday Sermon - Religious Thoughts


Religion divides the universe into spiritual and physical realms and all religions offer their adherents relief from their earthly problems through some sort of appeal to the spiritual. Religions locate the solution to society’s problems in the individual’s salvation. Socialists see the problems that wrack human society as material and political, and their solutions as likewise material and political, not supernatural. Socialists do not hold beliefs. They have an understanding of the world based on the best evidence available.

Ideas have no independent existence from human beings, and those ideas are determined by the material world in which we live. God only exists as an idea in society. Gods are products of the human imagination given powers to dominate the lives of those who create them.
\
Socialism, as the science of society, is an essential part of a scientific view of all phenomena regarded as an interdependent whole; and such a monistic view of the universe, with each part in inseparable causal relation to the rest, can leave no nook or cranny for God or Gods. The concept of God as an explanation of the Universe is becoming entirely untenable in this age of scientific enquiry. The laws of the persistence of force and the indestructibility of matter, and the unending inter-play of cause and effect, make the attempt to trace the origin of things to an anthropomorphic God who had no cause futile. The physical laws of the known universe cannot logically be held to cease where our immediate experience ends, to make way for an unscientific concept of a creating being. The creation idea is unsupported by evidence, and is in conflict with every scientific law. Socialism is consistent only with that monistic view which regards all phenomena as expressions of the underlying matter-force reality and as parts of the unity of Nature which interact according to the laws of physics.



The consistent socialist, therefore, cannot be a Christian, or Moslem or Jew or Hindu. As a belief, religion is a manifestation of man’s ignorance of Nature’s working. The great theoretic weapon of the workers in their fight for emancipation is science, not religion; and religion and science are as incompatible as fire and water. Religion is an instrument of domination which cannot be used as an agent of emancipation at this stage of history and social development. The working class, moreover, though not as yet hostile to religion, are becoming increasingly indifferent to it. Workers find little basis for belief in divine interference.

The decay of religion is, indeed, a measure of the advance of humanity, for the height of man’s superstition is at the same time the depth of his ignorance. The socialist can see, accompanying the decline of religion, humanity emerging from the darkness of ignorance and fear into the clear daylight of science and power, spurning the priests who had duped them, dispossessing the class that had robbed them, and moulding society to their needs, ordering and perfecting the social forces they have inherited. Socialists can picture the people, no longer slaves, but free: no longer in fear of phantoms of their own creation, but looking proudly out upon a harmonious and rational social world, harnessing giant natural forces to industry, and intensifying their relationship with Nature by a wider knowledge of its laws. Socialists see a social organisation adapted to give all people health and happiness by freeing them from wasteful drudgery and by stimulating healthy emulation in a new birth of science and the arts. And so the community of brothers and sisters, that Christianity professed but could only retard, becomes at last a reality through the complete harmony of interests brought about by the co-operative commonwealth; a made inevitable, because the social organisation makes the highest welfare and happiness of each immediately dependent upon, and producible only by the promotion of the like well-being of all.

Despite the innumerable charitable efforts of religion organizations, NONE of them have alleviated poverty in any measurable or sustained way. NOT one has eradicated poverty. Apart from soup-kitchens  and a few handouts religious organizations and their humanitarian operations in places like Africa simply keep some of the poor from starving to death, and that is so they can continue spreading the word—the primary form of advertising used by religions. Compared to the oil-tycoons and ultra-successful entrepreneurs and politicians, we are much poorer compared to today’s elite than your manna from heaven-fed, desert-wandering shepherd equivalent was compared to the elite in Jesus’ time.

Religion will die only when poverty is conquered. The Socialist Party says let the preachers, priests and parsons have their heaven, our task is to make sure the capitalists are given hell in the here and now.

AJJ

3 comments:

Mike McDade said...

Excellent. Just what I have been waiting for.

I am new to the socialist ideology, at age 47. I can only apologise for any delay on my part for the late arrival. I have a couple of questions:

- I am fully aware of the pain caused to mankind by a ruling class, especially in the name of false religion. However, is there scientific evidence that God doesn't exist?

-Where can I find the scientific evidence supporting evolution?

-Why is nature spelt as a proper noun?

- under a global socialist system, I can see why the notion of a creator would all but disappear. However, would the notion of freedom of "spiritual" thought be smashed out of existence, or would freedom of religion still exist?

Thank you.

ajohnstone said...

To answer your questions.

"is there scientific evidence that God doesn't exist?"

You cannot prove a negative and prove something does not exist. Just that it is an extremely unlikely possibility.

"Why is nature spelt as a proper noun?"
nature is just as valid and I sometimes use the phrase Mother Nature. Yes, it is anthromorphing a biosystem.

"Where can I find the scientific evidence supporting evolution?"

A search of the web would offer several sources. Start with wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

"would the notion of freedom of "spiritual" thought be smashed out of existence?"

Most likely the dualism of spirit and matter would disappear. Smashed out of existence is perhaps the wrong way to express it. Poets and writers and song writers may well continue raising the issues of life and death and love and all the indefinable emotions of the person.

"would freedom of religion still exist?"
Yes, most definitely. You cannot legislate or forbid thoughts. The popularity of religion would simply diminish, and like everything else, when insufficient adherents can no longer support the churches and clergy then they die off a natural death.

Put religion into the web-page search and you will find several other articles on religion on this blog






Mike McDade said...

Most helpful, most interesting, most reassuring. Thank you very much. Incidentally, the sooner the "need" for the churches and clergy dies off, the better!

(no need to publish this one!)

Kind regards.