When San Jose dismantled the "Jungle," the nation’s largest homeless
encampment, many of its residents with nowhere to go scattered. They
found hiding places in the scores of small, less visible encampments
within the city, where more than 5,000 people sleep unsheltered on a
given night.
But one group of about three dozen evictees gathered what they could
salvage in backpacks and trash bags, and crossed a bridge to a spot
about a mile away. They found a clean patch of grass near Coyote Creek,
the same creek that the Jungle abutted. There, they pitched tents
donated by some concerned citizens, assigned themselves chores and hoped
for the best.
Instead, they got marching orders. After weathering the hardest rains
to fall in these parts in a decade, the campers found 72-hour eviction
notices on their tents. Once again, a little more than a week after
their forced flight from the Jungle, they had no idea where they might
live.
“This is some sort of hell,” said Raul, 57 (who didn’t want his last
name used), a life-long resident of San Jose who had lived in the Jungle
for nearly eight years. He had nothing left of the home he had created,
just a knapsack, his chihuahua Pepe, and a new pup tent. He was so
depressed, he could barely lift his head.
To an outside observer, the eviction was predictable. The state’s
threat to sue Santa Clara County over the pollution in Coyote Creek
caused by camping spurred the closing of the Jungle, a winding, 68-acre
shantytown under an overpass with upwards of 300 people. With the
state’s environmental agencies—and the public—watching, San Jose could
not allow another Jungle to spring up.
But the city could offer no viable alternative to the people it was
expelling for the second time in a week. San Jose, the self-described
capital of Silicon Valley, the largest wealth generator in the United
States, lacked the resources.
The Jungle had become a symbol of the growing divide between the
nation’s rich and poor. But its December 4 dismantling—a spectacle of
crying residents struggling with shopping carts, Hazmat-suited cleanup
crews tossing furniture into dump trucks and hordes of police and
reporters standing watch—only underscored the problem, since so many
Jungle residents were literally left out in the cold.
Residents of the neighborhood in Central San Jose that abutted the
Jungle were glad to see the encampment go. But dismantling the Jungle is
already creating new problems. Just days after the Jungle was torn
apart, San Jose police and other city departments began fielding calls
from people in different neighborhoods complaining of former Jungle
residents setting up camps near them. Some ended up in a Walmart parking
lot before being booted. Others were congregating near the airport,
also under threat of eviction. At least one hospital reported an upsurge
of emergency room visits from former residents of the Jungle, sick from
weathering the elements, having misplaced medications in the eviction.
“What the city is saying is that it refuses to provide affordable
housing, but it does not tolerate people living outside,” said Sandy
Perry, an organizer at the Affordable Housing Network of Santa Clara
County, who has worked with San Jose’s homeless population since 1991.
“This is a willful, wholesale violation of human rights.”
San Jose, by all accounts, is experiencing a crisis in homelessness.
Even with dedicated non-profits working to stem the tide, the city’s
homeless problem, like that of other booming cities—New York, Los
Angeles and San Francisco, to name a few—has grown markedly worse in
recent years. San Jose is the nation’s 10th largest city (with one
million residents) but the San Jose/Santa Clara County area, home to 34
billionaires, has the nation’s fifth largest homeless population, after
New York, Los Angeles, Seattle and San Diego.
from here
No comments:
Post a Comment